-->
What are The Disadvantages of Flask-SQLAlchemy?

What are The Disadvantages of Flask-SQLAlchemy?

Back to top

Updated by Ashirafu Kibalama on April 02, 2024

Learn The Disadvantages of Flask-SQLAlchemy





Flask-SQLAlchemy is a widely used tool that facilitates seamless integration of Flask applications with relational databases. 


It combines Flask's simplicity with SQLAlchemy's robust ORM capabilities to create a powerful toolkit for developing database-driven web applications. 


However, like any technology, Flask-SQLAlchemy has its own set of drawbacks. 


In this article, we will analyze the disadvantages developers may encounter while using this extension, ranging from performance considerations to complexities in migrations. 


We aim to provide insights into making informed decisions when incorporating Flask-SQLAlchemy into your projects, ensuring a more straightforward development journey. 


So, let's dive deep into the world of Flask-SQLAlchemy and unravel its drawbacks.


7 Disadvantages of Flask-SQLAlchemy


1) Learning Curve

SQLAlchemy has a steep learning curve, and integrating it with Flask through Flask-SQLAlchemy can add complexity, especially for beginners.


2) Performance Overhead

ORM tools like SQLAlchemy can introduce a performance overhead compared to writing raw SQL queries, especially for complex queries or high-volume applications.


3) The overhead of Abstraction

Flask-SQLAlchemy abstracts away the details of the database, which can sometimes lead to less efficient queries being generated or difficulty in optimizing queries for performance.


4) Dependency on Flask

Flask-SQLAlchemy tightly couples your application to Flask and SQLAlchemy, which may limit your flexibility if you switch to a different framework or ORM.


5) The complexity of Migrations

Managing database schema changes and migrations can be more complex with Flask-SQLAlchemy than raw SQL migrations, especially in large projects with multiple developers.


6) Integration with Flask Extensions

While Flask-SQLAlchemy integrates well with Flask, combining it with other Flask extensions can sometimes be challenging, primarily if those extensions do not fully support SQLAlchemy.


7) Lack of Control Over SQL

While Flask-SQLAlchemy provides a powerful SQL expression language, developers comfortable writing raw SQL queries may find themselves limited by the Abstraction provided by Flask-SQLAlchemy.



Despite these disadvantages, Flask-SQLAlchemy remains a popular choice for many Flask developers due to its convenience, integration with Flask, and support for SQLAlchemy's powerful features. 


It's essential to weigh these disadvantages against your project's specific needs and requirements before deciding whether to use Flask-SQLAlchemy.


Please let us know how this blog post helped you or a point we missed to help us improve this post.


Your comment is of great importance to this blog post.


Thank you, and Happy Coding!


Related Posts:


1) With an Example Fix: Flask Migrate is not Working in Sqlalchemy 


2) With an Example Fix: How To Delete Existing Migration Files Flask Python / Directory migrations already exists and is not empty


3) With an Example Fix: Sqlalchemy.exc.OperationalError: (sqlite3.OperationalError) No Such Column:


4) Which is Better, SQLite or SQLAlchemy?


5) What Are The Purposes of Flask-SQLAlchemy in Python? 


6) When Should You Use SQLAlchemy? 


7) What are The Major Benefits of Using SQLAlchemy in Python?


8) What are The Differences Between Flask-SQLAlchemy and SQLAlchemy? 


9) With Example Learn: How do I Fix the Environment Location Directory is Not Empty in PyCharm? 


10) Sqlalchemy-migrate vs Alembic 


11) Flask-migrate vs Alembic